Whose picture is it? Copyright for children
Be able to explain that whoever created something decides over it, on the internet too.
Prerequisites
- AWrite a story together with an AIrequired
Everyday explanation
If you draw a drawing it is yours. You decide who may use it.
The same holds for everything somebody has created: pictures, songs, films, texts, games. It is called copyright, and it applies automatically — you do not have to apply for anything.
Something being on the internet does not mean it is free. A picture you find online was made by somebody, and that person still decides.
What you may do:
| May | Example |
|---|---|
| Look and read | everything that is published |
| Use it in schoolwork | usually fine, but write down where it comes from |
| Use pictures marked as free | CC0, CC BY, «public domain» |
| Use your own pictures | obviously |
What you may not do:
| May not | Why |
|---|---|
| Put somebody else's picture up as your own | that is taking something that is not yours |
| Sell something with somebody else's picture on it | even more clearly so |
| Put pictures of other people up without asking | that is also about their privacy |
Intuition
Where do you find pictures you may use?
| The place | What |
|---|---|
| Wikimedia Commons | millions of free pictures |
| Pictures marked CC0 | may be used freely, nobody has to be named |
| Pictures marked CC BY | may be used if you write who made it |
| Your own | always fine |
Writing down where something comes from is called giving the source, and it is a good habit even when you do not have to. It shows that you are not pretending to have made something you did not.
And what about AI images? Here it gets trickier, and there are three different questions:
| The question | The answer |
|---|---|
| May I use a picture I have generated? | usually yes — but check the tool's rules |
| Do I own it? | probably not — in Sweden a human being has to have created something for it to be protected |
| Is it fine to imitate an artist's style? | a style is not protected, but many artists do not like it |
The middle one surprises most people: a picture you have generated with AI can probably be used by anybody at all, because it is probably not protected at all.
One rule that always holds: do not generate pictures of real people without asking them. That is not a copyright question but a question of respect — and in some cases illegal.
Interactive
Task 1 — find free pictures.
Go to Wikimedia Commons and search for something you like. Click on a picture and find the licence. Does it say CC0? CC BY? Something else?
Write down three pictures you have found and what holds for each of them.
Task 2 — give the source.
For a CC BY picture you have to write who made it. It can look like this:
Picture: "Golden eagle" by Anna Andersson, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons
Write such a line for a picture you have found.
Task 3 — discuss in a group.
What do you think about these cases? There are no obvious answers.
| # | The case |
|---|---|
| 1 | Somebody puts your drawing on their account without asking |
| 2 | Somebody makes an AI image «in the style of» an artist who is alive today |
| 3 | Somebody uses your picture in a piece of schoolwork and writes your name |
| 4 | Somebody makes an AI image of your classmate |
| 5 | Somebody sells jumpers with an AI image that resembles a famous character |
Questions to discuss: Who is affected? What should the person have done instead? Is it illegal, unfair, or both?
Case 4 is the one that usually provokes the most discussion — and it is also the one where the answer is clearest: ask first.
Mastery means
- Explains what copyright is
- Knows what may and may not be used
- Knows what holds for AI images
Sign in to do the exercises and build your mastery up.
Sources
- PRV — copyright (in Swedish) — myndighetsmaterial
- Creative Commons — CC BY 4.0
- Swedish Media Council (in Swedish) — myndighetsmaterial