Skip to content
AI-grafen
CBuilderEthics, law and society· about 30 min· fundamentals that rarely change· verified 2026-09-20· EN

Disinformation and synthetic content

Be able to recognise AI-generated content and reason about watermarking.

Prerequisites

Intuition

Disinformation is false information spread with the intention of misleading. AI makes it cheaper to produce: text, voice and video in quantity, adapted to different audiences.

Signs to look for:

  • The picture or video exists in only one place and has no origin.
  • No other credible source reports the same thing.
  • The content provokes a strong feeling quickly (anger, fear) — it is designed to be shared.
  • Details that do not add up: shadows, hands, text in the image, lip sync, background sound.

The best check: a reverse image search, find the original, see what established sources say, wait a few hours.

Formal

Watermarking and provenance are technical countermeasures:

  • A visible mark («created with AI») — easy to crop away.
  • An invisible watermark in the pixels or in the choice of words — it survives some editing, but can often be removed by somebody who wants to.
  • Cryptographic provenance (C2PA/Content Credentials) — the camera or the program signs the file with metadata about its origin and edits. The signature cannot be forged, but the absence of a signature proves nothing.

The conclusion is uncomfortable but important: technology can establish authenticity, but not prove falsity. So the weight moves to source criticism: who says it, why, and what do independent sources say?

The EU AI Act requires synthetic content to be labelled — that raises the bar but does not solve the problem.

Mastery means

  • Recognises signs of synthetic content
  • Describes what watermarking can and cannot do

Sign in to do the exercises and build your mastery up.

Sources

All the sources and licences